01 / Code Pup membership
Service access.
Membership covers Code Pup service access under the plan’s scope and limits.
Paid to Code PupMembership preview
A review companion for developers who want to keep their own model-provider relationship.
Explore the plan before enrollment opens.

01 / The membership
Understand the parts before you choose.The membership is designed around Code Pup’s review workflow and your own model account. Service access and model usage have separate bills.
02 / BYOK, explained
Bring your own keyA membership payment and a model-provider bill do different jobs. Keep both in your evaluation of the total cost.
01 / Code Pup membership
Membership covers Code Pup service access under the plan’s scope and limits.
Paid to Code Pup02 / Model-provider usage
Your provider bills the model usage produced through your key. Rates, spending controls, and limits follow that provider’s terms.
Paid to your providerYour total cost combines service membership and provider usage. Provider rates and limits still apply.
03 / Code Pup & CodeRabbit
Choose on fit.Compare the review workflow, the way model access is handled, and the total cost for your team.
| What to compare | Code Pup | CodeRabbit |
|---|---|---|
| Getting started | Install the GitHub App, then have the selected repositories activated by the service operator. | A free plan includes pull-request summaries. Qualifying open-source projects can receive full Team features. Plan details ↗ |
| BYOK | Provider keys are configured by the operator today. The customer BYOK membership and key-onboarding flow are planned. | Own-provider integration is documented for self-hosted Enterprise, currently with a 500-seat minimum. Self-hosting details ↗ |
| Published paid plans | Pricing has not been announced. The membership model separates service access from provider usage. |
|
Plan terms can change. Compare both service fees and model usage for your own workload; BYOK alone does not determine savings.
Why consider Code Pup?
You want a distinctive review companion, specific feedback close to the code, and a membership built around your own model-provider relationship.
04 / Find your fit
A tool should suit the way you work.BYOK fits developers who want to manage the model relationship themselves and keep a review companion in the pull request.
You understand your provider account and want to evaluate review usage against its rates and limits.
You value a specific observation, a clear consequence, and a practical next step over a vague status stamp.
You want a companion with personality while keeping the code, evidence, and decisions in focus.
05 / Membership questions
Not yet. Pricing and enrollment will be published before launch.
Two parts: Code Pup membership for service access, and model usage billed separately by your supported provider.
The current integration supports operator-configured Mistral, Kimi, DeepSeek, and Grok. OpenAI and Anthropic adapters can be enabled through configuration. The customer membership’s supported-provider list will be confirmed before signup.
The service operator configures keys server side today. Customer key onboarding is planned.
Yes. CodeRabbit documents own-provider integration for its self-hosted Enterprise offering, currently with a 500-seat minimum. See its official self-hosted documentation for current terms.
No. Model-provider usage limits and rates still apply, along with the final Code Pup membership terms. BYOK itself makes no unlimited-use promise.
The reviewed diff and configured context go to the selected external model provider. Evaluate that provider’s data-handling and retention terms. A customer-controlled key does not by itself make the review local.
Keep the code in focus
Get to know the product and the way Code Pup turns a review into something you can act on.
Explore Code Pup Walkthroughs · inline findings · review commands